The negotiations around the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD): a Sudanese perspective

Yasir A. Mohamed and Seifeldin H. Abdalla

Water International, 2025, vol. 50, issue 6, 535-559

Abstract: This viewpoint discusses the negotiations over the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) among Ethiopia, Sudan and Egypt, with a particular emphasis on Sudan’s position. The analysis argues that the GERD dispute stems mainly from geopolitical and historical tensions rather than technical or economic issues. While the GERD holds potential for mutual benefit, it has instead become a source of regional tension. The authors argue that sustainable resolution requires the three countries to move beyond water resources and pursue broader regional cooperation in water, food, energy and economic integration. Failure to do so could lead to lasting political and economic consequences.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02508060.2025.2539566 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:rwinxx:v:50:y:2025:i:6:p:535-559

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rwin20

DOI: 10.1080/02508060.2025.2539566

Access Statistics for this article

Water International is currently edited by James Nickum, Philippus Wester, Remy Kinna, Xueliang Cai, Yoram Eckstein, Naho Mirumachi and Cecilia Tortajada

More articles in Water International from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().