EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Model misspecification, Bayesian versus credibility estimation, and Gibbs posteriors

Liang Hong and Ryan Martin

Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2020, vol. 2020, issue 7, 634-649

Abstract: In the context of predicting future claims, a fully Bayesian analysis – one that specifies a statistical model, prior distribution, and updates using Bayes's formula – is often viewed as the gold-standard, while Bühlmann's credibility estimator serves as a simple approximation. But those desirable properties that give the Bayesian solution its elevated status depend critically on the posited model being correctly specified. Here we investigate the asymptotic behavior of Bayesian posterior distributions under a misspecified model, and our conclusion is that misspecification bias generally has damaging effects that can lead to inaccurate inference and prediction. The credibility estimator, on the other hand, is not sensitive at all to model misspecification, giving it an advantage over the Bayesian solution in those practically relevant cases where the model is uncertain. This begs the question: does robustness to model misspecification require that we abandon uncertainty quantification based on a posterior distribution? Our answer to this question is No, and we offer an alternative Gibbs posterior construction. Furthermore, we argue that this Gibbs perspective provides a new characterization of Bühlmann's credibility estimator.

Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03461238.2019.1711154 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2020:y:2020:i:7:p:634-649

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/sact20

DOI: 10.1080/03461238.2019.1711154

Access Statistics for this article

Scandinavian Actuarial Journal is currently edited by Boualem Djehiche

More articles in Scandinavian Actuarial Journal from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:2020:y:2020:i:7:p:634-649