EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Great War and the transformation of the Atlantic copper trade

Nathan Delaney

Scandinavian Economic History Review, 2017, vol. 65, issue 3, 263-278

Abstract: Just before the First World War, 70% of the globe’s copper was mined or processed in the U.S. At that time, nearly the same percentage of copper was consumed in Europe – the vast majority of which originated from American mines. At first glance, a trade dynamic of this sort would appear to strongly favour the position of U.S. producers; surprisingly, sources indicate that control of the world’s copper trade was largely the prerogative of a select group of German metal trading companies – the largest and most influential among them was Metallgesellschaft (MG). The following essay explores the competitive dynamics among producers, consumers, and intermediary groups. It argues that U.S. producers were only able to gain substantive control over the supply and marketing of copper in the wake of the economic disruption caused by the Great War.

Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03585522.2017.1377633 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:sehrxx:v:65:y:2017:i:3:p:263-278

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/sehr20

DOI: 10.1080/03585522.2017.1377633

Access Statistics for this article

Scandinavian Economic History Review is currently edited by Espen Ekberg and Francisco Beltran Tapia

More articles in Scandinavian Economic History Review from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:sehrxx:v:65:y:2017:i:3:p:263-278