Do jobs follow people or people follow jobs? A meta-analysis of Carlino–Mills studies

Gerke J. Hoogstra, Jouke van Dijk and Raymond Florax

Spatial Economic Analysis, 2017, vol. 12, issue 4, 357-378

Abstract: Do jobs follow people or people follow jobs? A meta-analysis of Carlino–Mills studies. Spatial Economic Analysis. This study examines the classic question as to whether ‘jobs follow people’ or ‘people follow jobs’ by performing a meta-analysis of 321 results from 64 Carlino–Mills studies. It is found that the results are highly divergent, but that more results point towards ‘jobs following people’ than towards ‘people following jobs’. When it comes to the reasons for the variation in results, we find that the results are mostly shaped by the geographical location, spatial resolution, and population and employment characteristics present in the data, as well as by the model’s specification, its functional form and the spatial weight matrix specification.

Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17421772.2017.1340663 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:specan:v:12:y:2017:i:4:p:357-378

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RSEA20

DOI: 10.1080/17421772.2017.1340663

Access Statistics for this article

Spatial Economic Analysis is currently edited by Bernie Fingleton and Danilo Igliori

More articles in Spatial Economic Analysis from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().