Measuring regional inequality: to weight or not to weight?

Konstantin Gluschenko

Spatial Economic Analysis, 2018, vol. 13, issue 1, 36-59

Abstract: Measuring regional inequality: to weight or not to weight? Spatial Economic Analysis. When estimating regional inequality, many economists use inequality indices weighted by regions’ proportion of the national population. Although this approach is widespread, its adequacy has not received attention in the regional science literature. This paper proves that such an approach is conceptually inconsistent, yielding an estimate of interpersonal inequality among the whole population of the country rather than an estimate of regional inequality. Nevertheless, as a measure of interpersonal inequality, such an estimate is very rough (even misleading) and does not always have an intuitive interpretation. Moreover, population-weighted inequality indices do not meet the requirements for an adequate measure of inequality.

Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17421772.2017.1343491 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: ‘Williamson’s Fallacy’ in Estimation of Inter-Regional Inequality (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:specan:v:13:y:2018:i:1:p:36-59

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RSEA20

DOI: 10.1080/17421772.2017.1343491

Access Statistics for this article

Spatial Economic Analysis is currently edited by Bernie Fingleton and Danilo Igliori

More articles in Spatial Economic Analysis from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().