EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Are mobile phone conversations always so annoying? The ‘need-to-listen’ effect re-visited

Brendan Norman and Daniel Bennett

Behaviour and Information Technology, 2014, vol. 33, issue 12, 1294-1305

Abstract: According to Monk et al. (2004a. Why are mobile phones annoying? Behaviour and Information Technology, 23 (1), 33–42), mobile phone conversations are annoying to overhear due to an involuntary need-to-listen in order to predict the inaudible half of the conversation. However, previous support for this need-to-listen explanation of annoyance has failed to consider the confound that mobile phone conversations also have less predictable acoustic patterns and has only investigated ‘neutral’ conversations. By staging mobile and face-to-face conversations in public, this study further supports the need-to-listen explanation. By removing the need-to-listen to the content of a mobile conversation through introducing foreign speech, bystanders no longer perceived the conversation as more annoying than a conversation between two co-present individuals, supporting the need-to-listen explanation over unpredictable acoustics. In two further experiments manipulating conversational content (‘neutral’ vs. ‘intriguing’), findings suggest that the need-to-listen to mobile phone conversations is not inherently annoying; it can be annoying or possibly even ‘interesting’ depending on the conversational content.

Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2013.876098 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:33:y:2014:i:12:p:1294-1305

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/tbit20

DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2013.876098

Access Statistics for this article

Behaviour and Information Technology is currently edited by Dr Panos P Markopoulos

More articles in Behaviour and Information Technology from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:33:y:2014:i:12:p:1294-1305