An approach for preventing the indexing of hijacked journal articles in scientific databases

Mehdi Dadkhah, Tomasz Maliszewski and Vyacheslav V. Lyashenko

Behaviour and Information Technology, 2016, vol. 35, issue 4, 298-303

Abstract: Hijacked journals are cloned websites that resemble the homepages of legitimate journals, whose aim is to collect processing and publication fees from unwary authors. There is a growing recognition that the recent proliferation of these scam sites poses a threat to the integrity of the scientific process. This study presents an approach intended to prevent the indexing of papers published by hijacked journals in scientific databases by using classification algorithms. We will provide an overview of the problem, define key features of hijacked journals, and present a decision tree that can be used to detect hijacked publications.

Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0144929X.2015.1128975 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:tbitxx:v:35:y:2016:i:4:p:298-303

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/tbit20

DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2015.1128975

Access Statistics for this article

Behaviour and Information Technology is currently edited by Dr Panos P Markopoulos

More articles in Behaviour and Information Technology from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().