EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Upstream, downstream: the importance of psychological framing for carbon emission reduction policies

Laurence Matthews

Climate Policy, 2010, vol. 10, issue 4, 477-480

Abstract: It is well known that the language, or psychological frame, in which options are articulated can make a substantial difference to individuals' judgements or choices with regard to those options. Among proposed carbon reduction schemes, upstream approaches (e.g. 'cap and dividend', 'cap and share') and downstream approaches (e.g. personal carbon trading) are often framed in terms of the more familiar concepts of taxes and rations, respectively. Formation and implementation of carbon reduction policies may therefore benefit both from understanding the effect of, and harnessing the power of, psychological framing. In particular, since the 'tax' frame is silent about the recycling of revenue to the population, advocates of upstream approaches need to craft a powerful frame associated with the concept of a 'recycled tax'. Meanwhile, among the assumptions included in the 'rations' frame are that a crisis exists and that 'rations' ought not to be traded. Advocates of downstream approaches thus need to address public perceptions relating to acknowledging the existence of a crisis and the legitimacy of trading.

Date: 2010
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.3763/cpol.2009.0022 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:10:y:2010:i:4:p:477-480

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/tcpo20

DOI: 10.3763/cpol.2009.0022

Access Statistics for this article

Climate Policy is currently edited by Professor Michael Grubb

More articles in Climate Policy from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:10:y:2010:i:4:p:477-480