Public acceptability of carbon pricing: unravelling the impact of revenue recycling

Jeroen Barrez

Climate Policy, 2024, vol. 24, issue 10, 1323-1345

Abstract: Carbon pricing has emerged as a prominent policy tool to mitigate climate change due to its proclaimed high efficiency and effectiveness. However, the successful and sustainable implementation of carbon pricing also depends on the public acceptability. This paper investigates how revenue recycling shapes public attitudes towards carbon pricing. A systematic literature review identified 48 relevant studies from 2004 to March 2023. Using qualitative content analysis I discern relevant factors and construct a typology of revenue recycling options. Subsequently, a consensus ordinal ranking of revenue recycling options, based on the empirical findings of the reviewed studies, synthesizes current knowledge. The results reveal that revenue recycling has a crucial impact on public acceptability. While environmental earmarking ranks highest, and reducing corporate taxes is the least preferred option, numerous other revenue recycling options lie between these two options. Moreover, the literature presents divergent findings regarding the level of public acceptability of specific revenue recycling options. The diversity of research contexts and designs introduces inherent limitations that may explain variations in rankings observed across different studies. Notably, I identify political trust related to and salience of revenue recycling as important factors affecting public acceptability of carbon pricing. Finally, this research offers a framework for policymakers seeking to design revenue recycling strategies that align with public preferences to implement carbon pricing.Revenue recycling is a critical element of effective carbon pricing mechanisms, as public acceptability depends substantially on how revenues are used.The proposed ranking offers a framework for policymakers to design carbon pricing policies. Environmental earmarking is the most preferred way of revenue recycling, but the acceptability of each revenue recycling option also depends on the specific context.Designing revenue recycling in line with public preferences can enhance public acceptability of carbon pricing policies, and hence, their implementation.Trust, communication and salience of revenue recycling can enhance public acceptability of carbon pricing.

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2024.2376747 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:24:y:2024:i:10:p:1323-1345

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/tcpo20

DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2024.2376747

Access Statistics for this article

Climate Policy is currently edited by Professor Michael Grubb

More articles in Climate Policy from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().