Preferences for climate change policies: the role of co-benefits

Jens Abildtrup, Jette Bredahl Jacobsen, Suzanne Elizabeth Vedel, Udo Mantau, Robert Mavsar, Davide Pettenella, Irina Prokofieva, Florian Schubert, Anne Stenger, Elsa Varela, Enrico Vidale and Bo Jellesmark Thorsen

Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2024, vol. 13, issue 1, 110-128

Abstract: Policies mitigating climate change provide a global public good but are also likely to imply local co-benefits where implemented. This may affect citizens’ preferences for what policy to implement as well as where to implement it. This aspect remains understudied despite its relevance for international climate negotiations, national policies, and the development of voluntary carbon credit markets. The results of a discrete choice experiment show that citizens in five countries (Denmark, France, Germany, Italy and Spain) have quite similar mean willingness to pay for carbon emission reductions and agree on the ranking of policies targeting different sectors. Specifically, policies targeting renewable energy use, are preferred over policies targeting industrial energy efficiency or carbon sequestration and biomass production in forests. Applying follow-up questions shows that concerns over co-benefits, notably air pollution, is linked to preferences for implementation in the home country. In the absence of co-benefits, citizens are indifferent or prefer policies implemented in other countries.Key policy highlightsCitizens in five European countries share preferences for climate change mitigation policies, though significant intra-national heterogeneity in preferences existPolicies targeting increased use of renewables are preferred over policies targeting improved energy efficiency in the industry.Citizens express preferences for policies implemented in their own country. This is associated with their perception of co-benefits. In particular, consideration of reduced air pollution as a side effect of investing in renewable energy and in energy efficiency in the industry are important determinants of preferences for national implementation of policies.Preferences for national co-benefits may both enhance policy acceptance and reduce willingness to support policies implemented in other countries. The latter aspect may reduce cost-effectiveness across countries but ease effort-sharing negotiations.

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21606544.2023.2223182 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Preferences for climate change policies: the role of co-benefits (2024)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:teepxx:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:110-128

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/teep20

DOI: 10.1080/21606544.2023.2223182

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy is currently edited by Ken Willis

More articles in Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().