Optimization methods to estimate alternatives in AHP: The classification with respect to the dependence of irrelevant alternatives

I. L. Tomashevskii

Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2018, vol. 69, issue 7, 1114-1124

Abstract: This paper focuses on specific rank reversal phenomena in optimization methods (the least squares method, the chi-square method, etc.) designed to derive preference weights of alternatives from pairwise comparison matrices in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. It is preferable that the most irrelevant alternative had no effect on the ranking of the other alternatives. Unfortunately, it appears that, for many methods, most irrelevant alternatives tend to dictate the rank order of all the remaining alternatives. Respectively, adding some irrelevant alternative may turn the most important alternative into an unimportant one and conversely.We classify the optimization methods with respect to the dependence of irrelevant alternatives and specify all possible “dictatorial” methods, which provide the absolute dictate of very irrelevant alternatives, and all methods, which are free from the dictate of such alternatives. For the dictatorial methods, we propose “weight function” modifications, which prevent the influence of irrelevant alternatives. We show that without the modification, “dictatorial” methods can add confusion and false recommendations in the decision-making process even in the most ordinary decision-making situations.

Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2017.1390533 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:69:y:2018:i:7:p:1114-1124

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/tjor20

DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2017.1390533

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of the Operational Research Society is currently edited by Tom Archibald

More articles in Journal of the Operational Research Society from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().