Bias in Balance Optimization Subset Selection: Exploration through examples

Hee Youn Kwon, Jason J. Sauppe and Sheldon H. Jacobson

Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2019, vol. 70, issue 1, 67-80

Abstract: When estimating a treatment effect from observational data, researchers encounter bias regardless of estimation methods. In this paper, we focus on a particular method of estimation called Balance Optimization Subset Selection (BOSS). This paper investigates all the possible cases that may lead to bias in the context of BOSS, provides examples for those cases and tries to mitigate the bias. While doing so, we define a balance hierarchy and a correct imbalance measure which corresponds to the form of the response functions. In addition, new imbalance measures drawn from the Cramer-von Mises test statistic are introduced. The cases of insufficient data and suboptimality that can arise in causal analysis with BOSS are also presented.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2017.1421848 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:70:y:2019:i:1:p:67-80

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/tjor20

DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2017.1421848

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of the Operational Research Society is currently edited by Tom Archibald

More articles in Journal of the Operational Research Society from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().