EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Exploring three-way group decisions with consensus evolution network for software ecosystem hierarchical criteria health rating

Mingwei Wang, Decui Liang and Zeshui Xu

Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2023, vol. 74, issue 6, 1536-1553

Abstract: The appropriate rating of software ecosystem health is to the benefit of its sustainable development. The rating method based on an expert panel with specialised knowledge is reliable for rating software ecosystem health. Complexity often causes obstacles for expert panels to give appropriate ratings. Facing complexity, hierarchical criteria system provides evaluation guides with multiple levels and multiple perspectives. However, at present, effective group decision-making under hierarchical criteria system remains a challenge. Thus, this article systematically investigates consensus reaching process and rating method under hierarchical criteria system of software ecosystem health, which are two important components of group decision-making. To master the consensus situation of all criteria and consensus relationships of pair-wise experts under hierarchical criteria system, we construct hierarchical consensus evolution network. Then, we further propose a novel consensus degree measurement and design a consensus reaching process with pair-wise adjustment by utilising hierarchical characteristics. For rating software ecosystem health efficiently, there are usually three ratings including health, sub-health and ill-health. Three-way decisions exactly provide semantic interpretation for these three ratings. Meanwhile, three-way decisions can reduce the risk of incorrect ratings. Considering these advantages, we develop three-way group decisions with hierarchical consensus evolution network to comprehensively rate software ecosystem health under hierarchical criteria system. Finally, take the health rating of the software ecosystem on GitHub as an example, we develop a series of experiment analysis to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2022.2096507 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:74:y:2023:i:6:p:1536-1553

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/tjor20

DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2022.2096507

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of the Operational Research Society is currently edited by Tom Archibald

More articles in Journal of the Operational Research Society from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:74:y:2023:i:6:p:1536-1553