EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Improving industrial automation selection with dynamic exponential distance in neutrosophic group decision-making framework

Amirhossein Nafei, Shu-Chuan Chen, Harish Garg, Chien-Yi Huang, Florentin Smarandache and Seyed Mohammadtaghi Azimi

Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2025, vol. 76, issue 12, 2474-2493

Abstract: In the fast-paced evolution of industrial technology, selecting optimal automation systems is essential for improving operational efficiency. Traditional decision-making frameworks often fall short in addressing the complex interplay of diverse criteria, especially under conditions of uncertainty and imprecision. This research proposes a decision-making methodology that integrates dynamic exponential distance (DED) within the VIKOR (VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) framework, enhanced by neutrosophic logic. This integration provides a more accurate decision-making process by revolutionizing distance calculations with exponential transformations. The DED approach amplifies differences in extreme values, enhancing the ability to distinguish between alternatives. The motivation behind this research is the growing need for a more robust decision-making framework that can better handle complex, uncertain, and contradictory information. The contributions of this research include developing the DED approach to enhance precision in distance calculations within neutrosophic environments using exponential transformations, introducing a comprehensive methodology to address uncertainty and indeterminacy in decision-making scenarios, and demonstrating the method’s adaptability to real-world industrial automation challenges by improving discrimination. The comprehensive case study validates the proposed method’s effectiveness, showing better discrimination between alternatives and adaptability to dynamic decision contexts. The runtime analysis highlights a balanced trade-off between computational demands and decision-making performance compared to other methods.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01605682.2025.2477665 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:76:y:2025:i:12:p:2474-2493

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/tjor20

DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2025.2477665

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of the Operational Research Society is currently edited by Tom Archibald

More articles in Journal of the Operational Research Society from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-12-13
Handle: RePEc:taf:tjorxx:v:76:y:2025:i:12:p:2474-2493