The role of prevailing individual absorptive capacity versus absorptive capacity development for different innovation outcomes

Mette Praest Knudsen and Stephanie Schleimer

Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 2022, vol. 20, issue 5, 704-718

Abstract: Utilising absorptive capacity theory, this study examines whether organisations should outsource knowledge acquisition of employees, i.e.,, by hiring employees with prevailing relevant knowledge, or whether to invest in the development of employees’ knowledge within the organisation for different types of innovations. Three hundred and thirty-five Danish firms in the European Manufacturing Survey reveal that individual knowledge must be differently organised to achieve different innovative outcomes. For new product development, organisations benefit from investing in employees with the highest possible domain-specific absorptive capacity, whilst for product-related service innovations, employees with more general knowledge should be hired. For the latter, employees’ individual absorptive capacity should be developed internally for best innovation outcomes. Irrespective of the type of innovation, providing flexible work arrangements is beneficial for performance and this effect is further substantiated by firm’s cross-functional capabilities. Important implications emerge for the organisation in terms of outsourcing versus developing individual absorptive capacity for different innovations.

Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14778238.2020.1787801 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:20:y:2022:i:5:p:704-718

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/tkmr20

DOI: 10.1080/14778238.2020.1787801

Access Statistics for this article

Knowledge Management Research & Practice is currently edited by Giovanni Schiuma

More articles in Knowledge Management Research & Practice from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().