Knowledge strategy typologies: defining dimensions and relationships
James S Denford and
Yolande E Chan
Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 2011, vol. 9, issue 2, 102-119
Abstract:
Studying knowledge strategy empirically requires that specific strategies be operationalized. In this paper, two existing knowledge strategy typologies (the Bierly & Chakrabarti typology of Loners, Explorers, Exploiters and Innovators and the von Krogh, Nonaka & Aben typology of Leveraging, Expanding, Appropriating, and Probing) are compared and mapped onto knowledge strategy dimensions, generating a set of eight ideal knowledge strategy profiles. These profiles are then applied to eight case studies, to develop a better understanding of knowledge strategies by investigating how the two typologies are related. Results suggest that a hierarchy exists between the two knowledge strategy typologies: the Bierly & Chakrabarti typology operates at the grand strategy level, while the von Krogh et al. typology works at the operational strategy level. Findings also suggest that consistent portfolios of operational knowledge strategies can support an organization's grand knowledge strategy.
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/kmrp.2011.7 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:tkmrxx:v:9:y:2011:i:2:p:102-119
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/tkmr20
DOI: 10.1057/kmrp.2011.7
Access Statistics for this article
Knowledge Management Research & Practice is currently edited by Giovanni Schiuma
More articles in Knowledge Management Research & Practice from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().