Online versus phone surveys: comparison of results for a bicycling survey
Yan Xing and
Susan Handy
Transportation Planning and Technology, 2014, vol. 37, issue 6, 554-567
Abstract:
Researchers in the transportation field rely heavily on traditional random-digit-dialing phone surveys and increasingly on online surveys. Many studies have looked at the strengths and weaknesses of the two methods, but few have examined differences in the inferences that can be drawn from the data generated by the two survey methods. In this paper, we compare both descriptive and inferential results from online and phone surveys with identical questions conducted in Davis, California. Results show that although bicycling behavior does not differ across the two survey samples, many socio-demographic characteristics do. The models developed from each sample have several statistically indistinguishable coefficients but also notable differences in key explanatory factors. The results suggest that online and phone survey methods have the potential to produce significantly different results, both descriptively and inferentially.
Date: 2014
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03081060.2014.921407 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:transp:v:37:y:2014:i:6:p:554-567
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/GTPT20
DOI: 10.1080/03081060.2014.921407
Access Statistics for this article
Transportation Planning and Technology is currently edited by Dr. David Gillingwater
More articles in Transportation Planning and Technology from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().