Stockholm congestion charging: an assessment with METROPOLIS and SILVESTER
Mohammad Saifuzzaman,
Leonid Engelson,
Ida Kristoffersson and
André de Palma ()
Transportation Planning and Technology, 2016, vol. 39, issue 7, 653-674
Abstract:
This paper reviews and compares the performance of two dynamic transportation models – METROPOLIS and SILVESTER – which are used to predict the impacts of congestion charging for Stockholm. Both are mesoscopic dynamic models treating accumulation and dissipation of traffic queues, route choice, modal split and departure time choice. The models are calibrated independently for the baseline situation without charges and applied to forecast the effects of congestion charging. The results obtained from the two models are mutually compared and validated against the actual outcome of the Stockholm congestion charging scheme. Both models successfully predict the outcomes of the congestion charging trial at both aggregate and disaggregate levels. Results of welfare analysis, however, differ substantially due to differences in model specification.
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03081060.2016.1204089 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:transp:v:39:y:2016:i:7:p:653-674
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/GTPT20
DOI: 10.1080/03081060.2016.1204089
Access Statistics for this article
Transportation Planning and Technology is currently edited by Dr. David Gillingwater
More articles in Transportation Planning and Technology from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().