Effectiveness of interventions for modal shift to walking and bike riding: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Lauren Pearson, Matthew J. Page, Robyn Gerhard, Nyssa Clarke, Meghan Winters, Adrian Bauman, Laolu Arogundade and Ben Beck

Transport Reviews, 2025, vol. 45, issue 4, 482-513

Abstract: BackgroundIdentification of priority interventions to support modal shift to walking and bike riding is challenged by the myriad of interventions available, and a lack of synthesised evidence for what types of interventions are most effective. With increasing investments in active travel, there is substantial demand for synthesised evidence of efficacy between intervention types. This systematic review aimed to measure the effectiveness of interventions to increase active travel with a primary outcome of modal shift.MethodsThe electronic databases MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched. Eligible study designs included randomised and non-randomised studies of interventions with specific study design features that enabled the estimation of causality with minimal risk of bias. Studies were categorised by intervention types described within the Behaviour Change Wheel.Results106 studies that assessed the impact of an intervention on walking, cycling or active transport overall were included. Findings demonstrate that physical environmental restructure interventions, such as protected bike lanes and traffic calming infrastructure, were most effective in increasing cycling duration (OR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.20–2.22). Other intervention types, including individually tailored behavioural programmes, and provision of e-bikes, were also effective (OR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.23–1.43, OR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.02–1.22). An intensive education programme intervention demonstrated the greatest impact on walking (OR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.68–2.21). This body of research would benefit from more rigors in study design to limit lower quality evidence with the potential for bias.ConclusionThis review provides evidence for investment in high-quality active transport infrastructure, such as protected bike lanes, to improve cycling and active transport participation overall. It also provides evidence for investment in other non-infrastructure interventions. Active transport research needs to move towards trials with consistent outcome measures to inform which combinations of interventions (including disincentives) are most effective.Study registrationPROSPERO CRD42023445982

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01441647.2025.2480292 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:transr:v:45:y:2025:i:4:p:482-513

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/TTRV20

DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2025.2480292

Access Statistics for this article

Transport Reviews is currently edited by Professor David Banister and Moshe Givoni

More articles in Transport Reviews from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().