Moment Problem and Its Applications to Risk Assessment

Ruilin Tian, Samuel H. Cox and Luis F. Zuluaga

North American Actuarial Journal, 2017, vol. 21, issue 2, 242-266

Abstract: This article discusses how to assess risk by computing the best upper and lower bounds on the expected value E[φ(X)], subject to the constraints E[Xi] = μi for i = 0, 1, 2, …, n. φ(x) can take the form of the indicator function ϕ(x)=I(-∞,K](x)$\phi (x)=\mathbb {I}_{(-\infty,K]}(x)$ in which the bounds on Pr(X≤K)$\Pr (X \le K)$ are calculated and the form φ(x) = (ϕ(x) − K)+ in which the bounds on financial payments are found. We solve the moment bounds on E[I(-∞,K](X)]$\mathrm{E}[\mathbb {I}_{(-\infty,K]}(X)]$ through three methods: the semidefinite programming method, the moment-matching method, and the linear approximation method. We show that for practical purposes, these methods provide numerically equivalent results. We explore the accuracy of bounds in terms of the number of moments considered. We investigate the usefulness of the moment method by comparing the moment bounds with the “point” estimate provided by the Johnson system of distributions. In addition, we propose a simpler formulation for the unimodal bounds on E[I(-∞,K](X)]$\mathrm{E}[\mathbb {I}_{(-\infty,K]}(X)]$ compared to the existing formulations in the literature. For those problems that could be solved both analytically and numerically given the first few moments, our comparisons between the numerical and analytical results call attention to the potential differences between these two methodologies. Our analysis indicates the numerical bounds could deviate from their corresponding analytical counterparts. The accuracy of numerical bounds is sensitive to the volatility of X. The more volatile the random variable X is, the looser the numerical bounds are, compared to their closed-form solutions.

Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10920277.2017.1302805 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:uaajxx:v:21:y:2017:i:2:p:242-266

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/uaaj20

DOI: 10.1080/10920277.2017.1302805

Access Statistics for this article

North American Actuarial Journal is currently edited by Kathryn Baker

More articles in North American Actuarial Journal from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().