20 Myths about Long–Short

Bruce I. Jacobs and Kenneth N. Levy

Financial Analysts Journal, 1996, vol. 52, issue 5, 81-85

Abstract: Popular conceptions of long–short investing are distorted by a number of myths, many of which appear to result from viewing long–short from a conventional investment perspective. Long–short portfolios differ fundamentally from long-only portfolios in construction, in the measurement of their risk and return, and in their implementation costs. Furthermore, long–short portfolios allow greater flexibility in security selection, asset allocation, and overall plan structure.

Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2469/faj.v52.n5.2028 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:52:y:1996:i:5:p:81-85

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/ufaj20

DOI: 10.2469/faj.v52.n5.2028

Access Statistics for this article

Financial Analysts Journal is currently edited by Maryann Dupes

More articles in Financial Analysts Journal from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().