Evidence on the Usefulness of Alternative Earnings per Share Measures

Ross Jennings, Marc J. LeClere and Robert B. Thompson

Financial Analysts Journal, 1997, vol. 53, issue 6, 24-33

Abstract: In February 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board adopted new reporting rules for earnings per share. The new standard replaces “primary” EPS with “basic” EPS and makes a minor adjustment in the computation of “fully diluted” EPS. A comparison of the extent to which basic, primary, and fully diluted EPS explain variation in stock prices for a large sample of NYSE- and Amex-listed firms from 1989 to 1995 suggests that analysts and investors are likely to be no worse off under the new standard than under the old and may, in fact, have access to better information under the new standard because of its enhanced disclosure requirements.

Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2469/faj.v53.n6.2127 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:53:y:1997:i:6:p:24-33

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/ufaj20

DOI: 10.2469/faj.v53.n6.2127

Access Statistics for this article

Financial Analysts Journal is currently edited by Maryann Dupes

More articles in Financial Analysts Journal from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().