 Goodwill Amortization and the Usefulness of EarningsRoss Jennings, Marc LeClere and Robert B. Thompson Financial Analysts Journal, 2001, vol. 57, issue 5, 20-28 Abstract: This study provides evidence of the effect of goodwill amortization on the usefulness of earnings data as an indicator of share value for a large sample of publicly traded companies over the 1993–98 period. This issue is of special interest because the Financial Accounting Standards Board recently adopted new accounting standards that eliminate the systematic amortization of goodwill in favor of a requirement to review goodwill for impairment when circumstances warrant. We found that earnings before goodwill amortization explain significantly more of the observed distribution of share prices than earnings after goodwill amortization and that when share valuations are based on earnings alone, goodwill amortization simply adds noise to the measure. These results suggest that eliminating goodwill amortization from the computation of net income will not reduce its usefulness to investors and analysts as a summary indicator of share value. Analysts frequently face the problem of how to consider goodwill amortization in their financial analysis. For many years, financial statement preparers and users have criticized the accounting requirement to amortize purchased goodwill against revenues over a period not to exceed 40 years. Critics have argued that goodwill may not decline in value and that, even if it does, the arbitrary amounts recorded periodically as goodwill amortization are unlikely to reflect that decline. In this view, goodwill amortization simply adds noise to earnings, thereby reducing their usefulness to investors. Accounting standard setters, in contrast, have until recently maintained that goodwill is likely to be a wasting asset in most circumstances and that recording goodwill amortization makes reported earnings more useful to investors by reflecting its decline in value. We provide empirical evidence as to which of these views is more consistent with the way in which investors price securities.This issue is of current interest to investors and analysts because of a recent change in the accounting rules for purchased goodwill. Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, the reported earnings of acquiring companies will no longer include charges for goodwill amortization. Goodwill acquired in a business combination is recognized as an asset, as in the past, but once it is recognized, the asset remains on the balance sheet indefinitely, subject only to review for impairment when circumstances warrant. Thus, the question arises of whether excluding goodwill amortization from reported earnings will enhance or detract from its usefulness to investors.To investigate this issue, we document the extent to which variation in stock prices is explained by earnings before goodwill amortization and by reported earnings, which includes goodwill amortization. Our analysis, based on a large sample of publicly traded companies reporting purchased goodwill in the six-year period of 1993–1998, involved comparing R2s from two cross-sectional regressions—one of stock price on earnings per share before goodwill amortization and the other of stock price on reported earnings. In interpreting the results of these comparisons, we assumed that prices reflect all value-relevant public information, so the earnings measure that explains more of the variation in stock prices can be viewed as the more useful summary indicator of share value.Our results provide evidence consistent with the criticisms of the previous accounting rules for goodwill. In each year and for the six-year period as a whole, earnings before goodwill amortization explain more of the variation in share prices than reported earnings, and for each year, the difference in explanatory power is statistically significant. Moreover, when we regressed stock prices on earnings before goodwill amortization and on goodwill amortization, we found that the estimated coefficient (valuation multiple) on earnings before goodwill amortization was large and highly significant whereas the estimated coefficient on goodwill amortization was statistically indistinguishable from zero. This finding strongly suggests that goodwill amortization merely adds noise to reported earnings. Overall, these results indicate that the recently adopted reporting rules for purchased goodwill are likely to increase the usefulness of earnings as a summary indicator of share value. Date: 2001 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:57:y:2001:i:5:p:20-28 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article Financial Analysts Journal is currently edited by Maryann Dupes More articles in Financial Analysts Journal from Taylor & Francis Journals |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.