EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Mandatory Retirement Savings

Meir Statman

Financial Analysts Journal, 2013, vol. 69, issue 3, 14-18

Abstract: Nudges toward voluntary defined-contribution retirement savings have transformed many nonsavers into savers but have left many behind. The author argues that it is time to switch from libertarian-paternalistic nudges to fully paternalistic shoves. He advocates a retirement savings solution centered on a paternalistic second layer of mandatory private defined-contribution savings accounts in a retirement savings pyramid, above the paternalistic first layer of Social Security and below the libertarian third layer of voluntary savings.Nudges toward voluntary defined-contribution retirement savings have transformed many nonsavers into savers but have left many behind. It is time to switch from libertarian-paternalistic nudges to fully paternalistic shoves. I draw on evidence from the United States and other countries to advocate a retirement savings solution centered on a paternalistic second layer of mandatory private defined-contribution savings accounts in a retirement savings pyramid, above the paternalistic first layer of Social Security and below the libertarian third layer of voluntary savings. Mandatory defined-contribution retirement savings plans exist in Australia, the United Kingdom, Israel, and other countries. Minimum mandatory contributions are set to increase to 12% of employee earnings in Australia, 8% of earnings in the United Kingdom, and more than 18% of earnings in Israel. Indeed, mandatory defined-contribution retirement plans are in effect at many U.S. universities, even if they are not described as such. Universities contribute an average of 10% of employee salaries as “core” contributions, regardless of employee contributions. Additional employee contributions are voluntary at some universities and mandatory at others. Existing mandatory defined-contribution retirement savings plans offer lessons about features worth adopting and features worth avoiding. Features worth adopting include the following:Combined mandatory contributions by employers and employees amounting to a minimum of 12% of earnings.A central agency to administer plans for employees whose employers do not provide defined-contribution retirement savings plans. Default offerings of well-diversified target-date funds set in one-year intervals. Fees not exceeding 30 bps. No borrowing from retirement savings accounts and no cashing out of accounts before retirement age. Enhanced financial literacy without hampering the retirement income of people lacking financial literacy.

Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2469/faj.v69.n3.3 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:69:y:2013:i:3:p:14-18

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/ufaj20

DOI: 10.2469/faj.v69.n3.3

Access Statistics for this article

Financial Analysts Journal is currently edited by Maryann Dupes

More articles in Financial Analysts Journal from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:69:y:2013:i:3:p:14-18