Choices Matter When Training Machine Learning Models for Return Prediction

Clint Howard

Financial Analysts Journal, 2024, vol. 80, issue 4, 81-107

Abstract: Applying machine learning to cross-sectional stock return prediction requires careful consideration of modeling choices. Common approaches that fail to account for heterogeneity or imbalanced stock representation in training data can lead to suboptimal performance. I study two strategies to address these issues: training group-specific models and predicting relative returns. Both approaches yield similar economic improvements over models trained on the full cross-section of US stock returns, with value-weighted trading strategies benefiting significantly. The findings underscore the importance of aligning machine learning modeling decisions with desired economic outcomes and provide guidance for researchers and practitioners seeking robust machine learning models.

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0015198X.2024.2388024 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:80:y:2024:i:4:p:81-107

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/ufaj20

DOI: 10.1080/0015198X.2024.2388024

Access Statistics for this article

Financial Analysts Journal is currently edited by Maryann Dupes

More articles in Financial Analysts Journal from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().