Small-business owners and their choice of banks: Some lessons from the banking literature and game theory in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic
Srinivas Nippani,
Jeffrey Muldoon,
Derek Yonai and
Diego Matricano
Journal of Small Business Management, 2025, vol. 63, issue 4, 1695-1720
Abstract:
Finance textbooks treat banks as homogenous institutions. Intuition suggests that small businesses should interact with large banks, given the latter’s ability to diversify risk. Large banks are involved in transactional banking as part of their business relationships, and small and community banks use soft information and value long-term relationships with borrowers. During the recent COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent Paycheck Protection Program lending, large banks supported bigger businesses while small and community banks supported small businesses. To investigate this phenomenon, we focus on the U.S. experience and conduct a game theory analysis. Based on the results, we recommend that small businesses develop long-term relationships with small and community banks, which are more likely to use soft information and support the small businesses during a crisis.
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00472778.2024.2399191 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:ujbmxx:v:63:y:2025:i:4:p:1695-1720
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/ujbm20
DOI: 10.1080/00472778.2024.2399191
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Small Business Management is currently edited by Eric Liguori
More articles in Journal of Small Business Management from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().