The frictions of highway protests in U.S. cities and the legislative backlash

Julie Cidell

Journal of Race, Ethnicity and the City, 2022, vol. 3, issue 2, 142-163

Abstract: Spaces of protest have long been of interest to scholars because of their transgressive and highly visible uses of urban space. However, the increased visibility such spaces bring also puts protestors at greater risk of a backlash from others who expect to be able to keep moving at their own pace. Starting in 2015, a series of protests in the U.S. began using large-scale transportation infrastructure in urban areas, especially Black Lives Matter activists. Shortly thereafter, in 2017, a series of bills were introduced in state legislatures across the U.S. to limit or criminalize this activity. This paper analyzes the arguments made by legislative sponsors and supporters of these bills, using the theoretical lenses of friction and the shoal to argue that in the highly mobile society of the U.S., fear of delay or disruption becomes even more powerful when combined with racialized fears of the city.

Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/26884674.2022.2087573 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:urecxx:v:3:y:2022:i:2:p:142-163

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/urec20

DOI: 10.1080/26884674.2022.2087573

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Race, Ethnicity and the City is currently edited by Casey Wagner, Ali Modarres and Yasminah Beebeejaun

More articles in Journal of Race, Ethnicity and the City from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().