The influence of gender-diverse boards on post-audit practices: A UK SME study

Frank Lefley, Petra Marešová, Eva Hamplová and Václav Janeček

The Engineering Economist, 2022, vol. 67, issue 2, 112-130

Abstract: This article extends the project-engineering management/post-audit literature into the field of business ethics and board gender diversity. As a result, it fills an important gap in the literature. Board gender diversity is an important issue with ramifications on corporate decision-making. Based on a sample of 163 UK small-medium enterprises (SMEs), our research shows differences between gender diverse (GD) boards and male-only boards in post-audit (P-A) practices. GD boards conduct more post-audits and adopt a more formal approach to post-audit procedures. There are significant differences between the two board types concerning the reasons for undertaking post-audits and the non-adoption of post-audits (P-As). An interesting observation is in the area of risk aversion, as we find an inconsistency between those SMEs that conduct P-As and those that do not. This inconsistency may reflect the earlier literature, which is inconclusive in its findings concerning females’ attitudes to risk. A further interesting observation from the data analysis shows that GD Boards appear to be more focused, while male boards are more diverse in their responses. This article is of relevance and general interest to engineering economists in an investment appraisal, P-A, project management, and governance environment, fostering diversity and equality in regulating corporate activities, assisting practitioners and policy-makers in understanding the importance of monitoring capital projects, and the role played by gender-diverse boards.

Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0013791X.2021.2000685 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:67:y:2022:i:2:p:112-130

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/UTEE20

DOI: 10.1080/0013791X.2021.2000685

Access Statistics for this article

The Engineering Economist is currently edited by Sarah Ryan

More articles in The Engineering Economist from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().