Bombing It: The Meaning and Sources of Suicide Bombing Failure
Jason Warner,
Ellen Chapin and
Quinn Sorenson
Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 2024, vol. 47, issue 3, 249-277
Abstract:
Over the years, political scientists and policymakers have striven to understand the circumstances under which terrorists fail, operationally and strategically. However, the question of failure has less frequently been approached through the lens of any one specific tactic. This article asks: how should one define and understand the sources of suicide bombing failure? After introducing a new definition of suicide bombing failure, the article next uses probit model analysis to test planner (or “architect”) versus militant (or “attacker”) sources of failure by using a unique dataset detailing the suicide bombing efforts of three of the most active African jihadist terror groups which leveraged suicide terrorism from 2007 to 2020 — al-Shabaab, “Boko Haram,” and Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (“AQIM”). It finds evidence that choices made by these groups’ “architects,” are most commonly correlated with suicide bombing failures, rather than operational failures by “attackers” themselves.
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1057610X.2021.1956062 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:uterxx:v:47:y:2024:i:3:p:249-277
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/uter20
DOI: 10.1080/1057610X.2021.1956062
Access Statistics for this article
Studies in Conflict and Terrorism is currently edited by Bruce Hoffman
More articles in Studies in Conflict and Terrorism from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().