 Can venture capital-backed IPOs compete with seasoned public companies?Susan Belden, Robert Keeley and Robert Knapp Venture Capital, 2001, vol. 3, issue 4, 327-336 Abstract: This paper investigates whether a small group of venture capital-backed initial public offerings (IPOs) were able to compete effectively with seasoned competitors. Previous studies have shown that IPOs have generally under performed seasoned companies. Using data from the Venture Capital Journal and Compustat , this paper tests for statistically significant differences in the long run market and operating performances of a carefully matched set of IPOs and seasoned companies. Using Wilcoxon paired sample tests as well as standard t-tests, it was found that over the nine years following the IPO, there were no statistically significant differences in market returns, except in the first year when the VCbacked IPOs under performed. On the operating side, it is found that there are no statistically significant differences, except that VC-backed firms have faster sales and asset growth. Our evidence suggests that this set of VC-funded IPOs was able to compete effectively with seasoned competitors. This is interesting and important because the previous research has found that newly public companies, on average, do not compete well against seasoned firms. Date: 2001 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:veecee:v:3:y:2001:i:4:p:327-336 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from DOI: 10.1080/13691060110045995 Access Statistics for this article Venture Capital is currently edited by Colin Mason and Richard T. Harrison More articles in Venture Capital from Taylor & Francis Journals |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.