Unknown Father in Suriname, 1838 to 1873

Huub Everaert

Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, 2013, vol. 46, issue 4, 203-219

Abstract: In this article, the author uses simulation techniques to discover what percentage of Surinamese slave women bore children by different fathers during the period 1838 to 1873. The matrifocal family, comprising wife and children, might well have predominated on the plantations. However, slave owners did not record fatherhood, and the debate is hampered by lack of data. Fortunately, Moravian missionaries recorded sexual relationships among slaves in Suriname, and by combining those sources with slave registers one can reconstruct detailed parts of the life course of female slaves. Due to the specific characteristics of the Moravian sources, however, the data suggest that some women conceived children during periods for which the Moravian sources make no description of the mother having had sexual relations. Three different simulation scenarios (full, constrained full, and constrained randomization) were developed to impute these missing fathers, each scenario consisting of 100 independent runs. Between and within the scenarios, the estimates of what percentage of slave women bore children by different fathers are robust. One may therefore conclude that in the two decades prior to 1863, about 45% of those women with at least two children had borne children fathered by different men.

Date: 2013
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01615440.2012.724349 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:vhimxx:v:46:y:2013:i:4:p:203-219

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/vhim20

DOI: 10.1080/01615440.2012.724349

Access Statistics for this article

Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History is currently edited by J. David Hacker and Kenneth Sylvester

More articles in Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().