Random Selection of Petit Jurors on the Virginia Frontier, 1746-55
Turk McCleskey and
James C. Squire
Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, 2014, vol. 47, issue 3, 128-137
Abstract:
Eighteenth-century English common-law courts used petit juries in civil litigation to try issues of fact or find damages after defendants defaulted. In colonial Virginia, county sheriffs impaneled potential jurors for trials of the issue; before trial, litigants selected a 12-man jury during voir dire . By contrast, juries on writs of inquiry to ascertain damages were selected solely by sheriffs and reached verdicts under the sheriff's supervision. Scholarly consensus holds juror selection to have been prejudiced, but pure probability predictions generated with hypergeometric distributions indicate that on writs of inquiry sheriffs often picked jurors in a functionally random manner. This article presents a new test for identifying bias in jury selection by identifying improbable numbers of magistrates, constables, and grand jurors.
Date: 2014
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01615440.2014.900337 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:vhimxx:v:47:y:2014:i:3:p:128-137
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/vhim20
DOI: 10.1080/01615440.2014.900337
Access Statistics for this article
Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History is currently edited by J. David Hacker and Kenneth Sylvester
More articles in Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().