Upper secondary school students’ conceptions of learning, learning strategies, and academic achievement
Giulia Vettori,
Claudio Vezzani,
Lucia Bigozzi and
Giuliana Pinto
The Journal of Educational Research, 2020, vol. 113, issue 6, 475-485
Abstract:
The relations between more surface- or deep-level learning approaches and academic achievement were investigated. Gender, level of study, and type of schools were moderating variables. 170 upper-secondary school students’ conceptions of learning and their chosen learning strategies were explored via two self-report questionnaires. Furthermore, their academic achievement in a range of subject areas was collected. A Confirmatory Factorial Analysis of the two questionnaires’ dimensions identified two factors showing learning approaches of different qualitative nature, more surface- or deep-level. Then, General Linear Models showed that the predictive impact of the tracked factors was differently related to students’ academic achievement. The factor “Deep metacognitive theory of learning” positively predicted academic achievement, whereas the factor “Surface metacognitive theory of learning” was a negative predictor.
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220671.2020.1861583 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:113:y:2020:i:6:p:475-485
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/vjer20
DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2020.1861583
Access Statistics for this article
The Journal of Educational Research is currently edited by Mary F. Heller
More articles in The Journal of Educational Research from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().