Reconsidering Evidence of Tasmanian Fishing

Everett Bassett

Environmental Archaeology, 2004, vol. 9, issue 2, 135-142

Abstract: For many years it has been accepted that prehistoric Tasmanians lost the ability to fish. This has led to the suggestion that small populations can become intellectually and culturally disadvantaged as a result of isolation and population size. This conclusion was based on assumptions regarding the value of fishing and on the significance of fish fauna found within archaeological contexts. A review of this issue suggests that fish remains from Tasmania are, instead, the result of primary butchering of juvenile seals at a few unique sites and that the prehistoric and ethnohistoric records are consistent. A framework is provided to test the contrasting interpretations.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1179/env.2004.9.2.135 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:yenvxx:v:9:y:2004:i:2:p:135-142

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/yenv20

DOI: 10.1179/env.2004.9.2.135

Access Statistics for this article

Environmental Archaeology is currently edited by Tim Mighall

More articles in Environmental Archaeology from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().