Small-holder farmers knowledge and information on the impact of climate variability & extremes on livestock production in Limpopo & Mpumalanga Provinces

Azwihangwisi Nesamvuni, Khuthadzo Ndwambi (), Khathutshelo A. Tshikolomo (), Gabriel R. Lekalakala (), Thomas Raphulu (), Brilliant M. Petja () and Johan Van Niekerk ()
Additional contact information
Khuthadzo Ndwambi: Department of Sustainable Food Systems and Development, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein, 9300, South Africa
Khathutshelo A. Tshikolomo: Department of Sustainable Food Systems and Development, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein, 9300, South Africa, Limpopo Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Private Bag X9487, Polokwane, 0700, South Africa
Gabriel R. Lekalakala: Research Office, Parliament of South Africa, Cape Town, 8000, South Africa, 4Water Research Commission, Lynnwood Manor, Pretoria, 0081, South Africa
Thomas Raphulu: Limpopo Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Private Bag X9487, Polokwane, 0700, South Africa
Brilliant M. Petja: Water Research Commission, Lynnwood Manor, Pretoria, 0081, South Africa
Johan Van Niekerk: Department of Sustainable Food Systems and Development, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein, 9300, South Africa

Technium Social Sciences Journal, 2022, vol. 27, issue 1, 854-869

Abstract: A study was carried out to investigate the level of awareness, knowledge and information of small-holder farmers (SHLF) on the impact of climatic change (CC) and extremes on livestock production in Limpopo and Mpumalanga Provinces. At least 366 smallholder farmers were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire to elicit responses on vulnerability. Almost all the farmers (96 %) have heard about CC only a few farmers (4 %) did not know CC. The medium for the conveyance of CC information was the main radio (94.32%). Newspapers and television were also efficient mediums in the conveyance of this information, each with the outreach of 16.76 and 32.67%, respectively. Central to the impact of CC was the fact that (90%) of the farmers confirmed that there was a change in grass availability; which contributed to major livestock fatalities of which over half of the farmers (55.19%) attested as the cause. The study found that 86.67% of SHLF who attended awareness meetings indicated that the discussions prioritized adapting to CC. However, SHLF (80.77%) did not have an early warning system. This was coupled with a lack of contingency plans by (84.36%) the farmers to deal with the impact of the said drought on their farms. SHLF (19%) who had facilitated contingency plans indicated that improved aspects of the plan should incorporate the support of their provision feeds, drilling of boreholes, and erection of dams. Based on SHLF perceptions there is a need for strategic shifts from grazing to small scale feed-lots.

Keywords: Climate Change; Early Warning; Natural Pastures (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/5299/2005 (application/pdf)
https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/5299 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tec:journl:v:27:y:2022:i:1:p:854-869

DOI: 10.47577/tssj.v27i1.5299

Access Statistics for this article

Technium Social Sciences Journal is currently edited by Tasente Tanase

More articles in Technium Social Sciences Journal from Technium Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tasente Tanase ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).