Evaluating Urban Transport Improvements: Cost-Benefit Analysis in the Presence of Agglomeration and Income Taxation
Anthony Venables
Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 2007, vol. 41, issue 2, 173-188
Abstract:
There is a substantial empirical literature quantifying the positive relationship between city size and productivity. This paper studies the implications of that relationship for evaluations of urban transport improvements. A theoretical model is developed and used to derive a cost-benefit measure that includes the impact of transport improvements on city size and hence on the productivity of new and existing city workers. The size of such effects is illustrated in a simple computable equilibrium model. It is argued that these productivity effects, particularly when combined with distortionary taxation, are quantitatively important, substantially increasing the gains attributable to urban transport improvements. © 2007 LSE and the University of Bath
Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (153)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.catchword.com/cgi-bin/cgi?ini=bc&body=l ... 0070501)41:2L.173;1- (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Evaluating Urban Transport Improvements: Cost Benefit Analysis in the Presence of Agglomeration and Income Taxation (2004) 
Working Paper: Evaluating urban transport improvements: cost benefit analysis in the presence of agglomeration and income taxation (2004) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tpe:jtecpo:v:41:y:2007:i:2:p:173-188
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Transport Economics and Policy is currently edited by B T Bayliss, S A Morrison, A Smith and D Graham
More articles in Journal of Transport Economics and Policy from University of Bath
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().