Subsidisation of Urban Public Transport and the Mohring Effect

Peran van Reeven

Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 2008, vol. 42, issue 2, 349-359

Abstract: Mohring (1972) argues that urban public transport exhibits considerable economies of scale if users' waiting time is included in the cost function. The implication is that without subsidisation, frequencies will be lower than socially optimal. This paper analyses this argument and shows that economies of scale do not constitute a justification for general subsidisation of urban public transport. If an operator is allowed to take the demand effect of their pricing and frequency decisions into account, then the profit-maximising frequency is shown to be at least as high as the welfare-maximising frequency. © 2008 LSE and the University of Bath

Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (23)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.catchword.com/cgi-bin/cgi?ini=bc&body=l ... 0080501)42:2L.349;1- (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tpe:jtecpo:v:42:y:2008:i:2:p:349-359

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Transport Economics and Policy is currently edited by B T Bayliss, S A Morrison, A Smith and D Graham

More articles in Journal of Transport Economics and Policy from University of Bath
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().