Comparing the Costs of Vertical Separation, Integration, and Intermediate Organisational Structures in European and East Asian Railways
Chris Nash and
Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 2015, vol. 49, issue 3, 496-515
This is the first study in the academic literature to examine, using econometric methods, the cost impacts of three different approaches to structuring railway systems: vertical separation, vertical integration, and the intermediate holding company model. Our analysis is based on a panel of European and East Asian railways (1994-2010). We find that the optimal railway structure depends on the intensity and type of traffic running on the network. Our research suggests that, at least on cost grounds, countries should be free to choose between vertical integration, the holding company model, or vertical separation. © 2015 LSE and the University of Bath
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.catchword.com/cgi-bin/cgi?ini=bc&body=l ... 0150701)49:3L.496;1- (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: Comparing the Costs of Vertical Separation, Integration, and Intermediate Organisational Structures in European and East Asian Railways (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tpe:jtecpo:v:49:y:2015:i:3:p:496-515
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Transport Economics and Policy is currently edited by B T Bayliss, S A Morrison, A Smith and D Graham
More articles in Journal of Transport Economics and Policy from University of Bath
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().