EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Cool Rationalities and Hot Air: A Rhetorical Approach to Understanding Debates on Renewable Energy

John Barry, Geraint Ellis and Clive Robinson
Additional contact information
John Barry: John Barry is Reader in Politics at the School of Politics, International Studies and Philosophy, Queens University, Belfast. His recent publications include Environment and Social Theory, 2-super-nd edition (2007); and "Towards a Model of Green Political Economy: From Ecological modernisation to Economic Security", International Journal of Green Economics 1 (3/4) (2007). He is the co-author, with Peter Doran, of "Refining Green Political Economy: From Ecological Modernisation to Economic Security and Sufficiency", Analyse & Kritik 28 (3) (2006); and co-editor, with Robyn Eckersley, of The Nation-State and the Global Ecological Crisis (2005).
Geraint Ellis: Geraint Ellis is Senior Lecturer in the School of Planning, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Queens University, Belfast. His recent publications include "Many Ways to Say 'No', Different Ways to Say 'Yes': Applying Q-Methodology to Understand Public Acceptance of Wind Farm Proposals," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 50 (4) (2007), co-authored with John Barry and Clive Robinson; and "Reparation or Retribution: An Investigation into Regulatory Compliance in Planning," Environment and Planning A 37 (4) (2005), co-authored with Stephen McKay.
Clive Robinson: Clive Robinson is a PhD student at Queen's University, Belfast, and was research assistant on the Renewable Energy and Discourses of Objection Project from which this paper emerged. His main research interest is the application and development of Q-Methodology and increasing the profile of human subjectivity within sustainable decision making. He is the co-author, with John Barry and Geraint Ellis, of "Many Ways to Say 'No', Different Ways to Say 'Yes': Applying Q-Methodology to Understand Public Acceptance of Wind Farm Proposals," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 50 (4) (2007).

Global Environmental Politics, 2008, vol. 8, issue 2, 67-98

Abstract: A key obstacle to the wide-scale development of renewable energy is that public acceptability of wind energy cannot be taken for granted when wind energy moves from abstract support to local implementation. Drawing on a case study of opposition to the siting of a proposed off-shore wind farm in Northern Ireland, we offer a rhetorical analysis of a series of representative documents drawn from government, media, pro- and anti-wind energy sources, which identifies and interprets a number of discourses of objection and support. The analysis indicates that the key issue in terms of the transition to a renewable energy economy has little to do with the technology itself. Understanding the different nuances of pro- and anti-wind energy discourses highlights the importance of thinking about new ways of looking at these conflicts. These include adopting a "conflict resolution" approach and "upstreaming" public involvement in the decision-making process and also the counter-productive strategy of assuming that objection is based on ignorance (which can be solved by information) or NIMBY thinking (which can be solved by moral arguments about overcoming "free riders"). (c) 2008 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (28)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1162/glep.2008.8.2.67 link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:8:y:2008:i:2:p:67-98

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://mitpressjour ... rnal/?issn=1526-3800

Access Statistics for this article

Global Environmental Politics is currently edited by Steven Bernstein, Matthew Hoffmann and Erika Weinthal

More articles in Global Environmental Politics from MIT Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The MIT Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:8:y:2008:i:2:p:67-98