EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Scarcity and Cooperation Along International Rivers

Shlomi Dinar
Additional contact information
Shlomi Dinar: Shlomi Dinar is Assistant Professor in the Department of Politics and International Relations at Florida International University in Miami. His research interests include conflict and cooperation along international rivers, international negotiation, and the connections between environmental and security issues. He is author, most recently, of International Water Treaties: Negotiation and Cooperation along Transboundary Rivers (2008); and Bridges over Water: Understanding Transboundary Water Conflict, Negotiation and Cooperation (2007; co-authored with Ariel Dinar, Stephen McCaffrey, and Daene McKinney).

Global Environmental Politics, 2009, vol. 9, issue 1, 109-135

Abstract: Scarcity is often argued to be an important variable associated with explaining both conflict and cooperation over international freshwater. Yet it is the relationship between scarcity and cooperation that deserves additional scrutiny and, subsequently, rigorous empirical investigation. Building on existing literature, this article highlights the relationship between water scarcity and interstate cooperation. A model is introduced hypothesizing that cooperation is most likely to take place when the resource is neither abundant (when there is no real impetus for cooperation) nor highly scarce (when there is little of the resource to divide among the parties or the degradation too costly to manage). Rather, formal coordination in the form of an international water treaty is most likely to ensue at levels of moderate (or relative) scarcity. An inverted U-shaped curve, rather than a linear interaction, is consequently suggested for the relationship between water scarcity and cooperation. To illustrate this relationship, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) test is conducted using seventy-four country dyad observations, an associated scarcity index, and corresponding international treaty observations. Overall, results support the scarcity-cooperation assertion. Future research is needed to investigate this relationship in a more empirical and econometrically rigorous fashion. (c) 2009 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1162/glep.2009.9.1.109 link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:9:y:2009:i:1:p:109-135

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://mitpressjour ... rnal/?issn=1526-3800

Access Statistics for this article

Global Environmental Politics is currently edited by Steven Bernstein, Matthew Hoffmann and Erika Weinthal

More articles in Global Environmental Politics from MIT Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The MIT Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:9:y:2009:i:1:p:109-135