Sensitivity to Market Incentives: The Case of Policy Loans

Mark Warshawsky

The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1987, vol. 69, issue 2, 286-95

Abstract: The standard neoclassical theory is rejected as an explanation for the observed reluctance of most holders of whole life insurance to borrow against the cash value of their policies at favorable rates of interest. Even when the neoclassical theory is augmented with transactions costs and short awareness lags, several empirical tests using survey and time-series data reject the standard theory in favor of an explanation invoking self-imposed rules against borrowing or the "debt ethic." This evidence lends support to the psychology-based theories of Thaler and Shefrin (1981). Copyright 1987 by MIT Press.

Date: 1987
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0034-6535%2819870 ... O%3B2-W&origin=repec full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tpr:restat:v:69:y:1987:i:2:p:286-95

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://mitpressjour ... rnal/?issn=0034-6535

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Economics and Statistics is currently edited by Pierre Azoulay, Olivier Coibion, Will Dobbie, Raymond Fisman, Benjamin R. Handel, Brian A. Jacob, Kareen Rozen, Xiaoxia Shi, Tavneet Suri and Yi Xu

More articles in The Review of Economics and Statistics from MIT Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The MIT Press ().