The Bias Due to Omitting Quality When Estimating Automobile Demand

Gregory A Trandel

The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1991, vol. 73, issue 3, 522-25

Abstract: The conclusions of policy-oriented market studies often hinge upon the size of an estimated demand elasticity. Few of the researchers who have estimated such elasticities have utilized a variable designed to measure the subjective concept of "quality." If quality both significantly affects the demand for a heterogeneous good and is positively correlated with price, omitting quality from a demand regression will lead to a downward bias in the estimated price elasticity. Using Levinsohn's (1988) model of the automobile market as a framework, this note shows that including quality variables can increase the model's estimated price elasticity by more than 80 percent. Copyright 1991 by MIT Press.

Date: 1991
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0034-6535%2819910 ... 0.CO%3B2-G&origin=bc full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tpr:restat:v:73:y:1991:i:3:p:522-25

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://mitpressjour ... rnal/?issn=0034-6535

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Economics and Statistics is currently edited by Pierre Azoulay, Olivier Coibion, Will Dobbie, Raymond Fisman, Benjamin R. Handel, Brian A. Jacob, Kareen Rozen, Xiaoxia Shi, Tavneet Suri and Yi Xu

More articles in The Review of Economics and Statistics from MIT Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The MIT Press ().