Does Consumption Take a Random Walk? Some Evidence from Macroeconomic Forecasting Data

Albert Jaeger

The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1992, vol. 74, issue 4, 607-14

Abstract: Professional forecasts of aggregate U.S. consumption series strongly reject Robert E. Hall's (1978) random walk hypothesis. Band spectrum regressions show that low-frequency variations in growth ra tes of expenditures on nondurables and services, defined as cycles takin g more than two years to complete, primarily account for the rejection. Consumption growth and professional forecasts of GNP growth are also closely related at the low but not at the high frequencies. Liquidi ty constraints or durable characteristics of consumption goods may both explain the reported findings. Copyright 1992 by MIT Press.

Date: 1992
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0034-6535%2819921 ... 0.CO%3B2-R&origin=bc full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tpr:restat:v:74:y:1992:i:4:p:607-14

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://mitpressjour ... rnal/?issn=0034-6535

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Economics and Statistics is currently edited by Pierre Azoulay, Olivier Coibion, Will Dobbie, Raymond Fisman, Benjamin R. Handel, Brian A. Jacob, Kareen Rozen, Xiaoxia Shi, Tavneet Suri and Yi Xu

More articles in The Review of Economics and Statistics from MIT Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The MIT Press ().