Pitfalls of Rescaling Regression Modes with Box-Cox Transformations
Marcel G Dagenais and
Jean-Marie Dufour ()
The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1994, vol. 76, issue 3, 571-75
Abstract:
To facilitate maximum likelihood estimation for Box-Cox models, several authors have suggested dividing the dependent variable by its sample geometric mean. This paper points out previously unmentioned drawbacks of this 'recalling.' First, the 'resealed' model is not actually equivalent to the untransformed one, so that the procedure involves more than a unit change. Second, there is no clear interpretation of the parameters after such resealing. The authors suggest an interpretation but find that the usual formulas for standard errors and confidence intervals are not asymptotically valid. Only tests for zero coefficients are valid. Thirdly, the authors discuss the appropriate way of measuring elasticities in such models. Copyright 1994 by MIT Press.
Date: 1994
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0034-6535%2819940 ... 0.CO%3B2-5&origin=bc full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
Related works:
Working Paper: Pitfalls of Rescalling Regression Models with Box-Cox Transformations (1993)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tpr:restat:v:76:y:1994:i:3:p:571-75
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://mitpressjour ... rnal/?issn=0034-6535
Access Statistics for this article
The Review of Economics and Statistics is currently edited by Pierre Azoulay, Olivier Coibion, Will Dobbie, Raymond Fisman, Benjamin R. Handel, Brian A. Jacob, Kareen Rozen, Xiaoxia Shi, Tavneet Suri and Yi Xu
More articles in The Review of Economics and Statistics from MIT Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The MIT Press ().