Economies of Scale and Natural Monopoly in the U.S. Local Telephone Industry

Nakil Sung and Michael Gort

The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2000, vol. 82, issue 4, 694-697

Abstract: This paper shows that firm-specific economies of scale—or net overall economies—are correlated with subadditivity. Both economies of scale and subadditivity are a decreasing function of firm size. Most firms are observed to be in the relatively flat portion of the long-run average cost curve, with pronounced economies of scale observable only at the low end of the scale. Economies of scope, as reflected in cost complementarities, do not appear to be a source of subadditivity. The results are estimated using translog total cost functions, and the fact that these cost functions include arguments for the quality of capital and of labor represents an innovation in methodology. © 2000 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Date: 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/rest.2000.82.4.694 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tpr:restat:v:82:y:2000:i:4:p:694-697

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://mitpressjour ... rnal/?issn=0034-6535

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Economics and Statistics is currently edited by Pierre Azoulay, Olivier Coibion, Will Dobbie, Raymond Fisman, Benjamin R. Handel, Brian A. Jacob, Kareen Rozen, Xiaoxia Shi, Tavneet Suri and Yi Xu

More articles in The Review of Economics and Statistics from MIT Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The MIT Press ().