Does Consumer Irrationality Trump Consumer Sovereignty?
Joel Waldfogel ()
The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2005, vol. 87, issue 4, 691-696
Scholars working on the border of economics and psychology have documented many contexts in which individual decision-making is unreliable and might be improved by paternalistic interventions. Against this mounting body of negative evidence, economists' default belief in consumer sovereignty has been motivated primarily by theory rather than evidence. The goal of the present study is to see whether there is direct evidence supporting economists' faith in consumer sovereignty in a simple context. We address this question by presenting direct evidence that consumers' own purchases generate between 10% and 18% more value, per dollar spent, than items received as gifts. © 2005 President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (11) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/003465305775098107 link to full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tpr:restat:v:87:y:2005:i:4:p:691-696
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://mitpress.mit. ... me.tcl?issn=00346535
Access Statistics for this article
The Review of Economics and Statistics is currently edited by Daron Acemoglu, George J. Borjas, Dani Rodrik and Julio J. Rotemberg
More articles in The Review of Economics and Statistics from MIT Press
Series data maintained by Kristin Waites ().