EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Procedural Invariance Testing of the One-and-One-Half-Bound Dichotomous Choice Elicitation Method

Ian Bateman, Brett H. Day, Diane Dupont and Stavros Georgiou
Additional contact information
Brett H. Day: Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment
Stavros Georgiou: Economic Analysis Unit, Health and Safety Executive, London

The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2009, vol. 91, issue 4, 806-820

Abstract: The contingent valuation method for estimating willingness to pay for public goods typically adopts a single referendum question format, which is relatively statistically inefficient. As an alternative, Cooper, Hanemann, and Signorello (2002) propose the one-and-one-half bound (OOHB) format, allowing researchers to question respondents about both a lower and higher limit on project costs, thereby securing substantial gains in statistical efficiency. Using an experimental design, we find that responses to OOHB valuation questions fail crucial tests of procedural invariance. We test various competing models of observed response patterns including strategic misrepresentation of standard preferences and nonstandard models of preference formation. Copyright by the President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (25)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/rest.91.4.806 link to full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tpr:restat:v:91:y:2009:i:4:p:806-820

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://mitpressjour ... rnal/?issn=0034-6535

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Economics and Statistics is currently edited by Pierre Azoulay, Olivier Coibion, Will Dobbie, Raymond Fisman, Benjamin R. Handel, Brian A. Jacob, Kareen Rozen, Xiaoxia Shi, Tavneet Suri and Yi Xu

More articles in The Review of Economics and Statistics from MIT Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The MIT Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:tpr:restat:v:91:y:2009:i:4:p:806-820