EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Partial Strikes under the Railway Labor Act: The Need for a Doctrine of Unprotected Concerted Activity*

Samuel Estreicher and Robert Siegel

Journal of Labor Research, 2002, vol. 23, issue 2, 319-328

Abstract: In light of use by airline unions of partial-strike tactics, such as concerted refusals to bid for overtime work and so-called "CHAOS" tactics involving unannounced refusals to fly after passengers have been ticketed and are ready to board, the authors examine whether the Railway Labor Act (RLA) should be interpreted to permit employers to discipline employees for engaging in such tactics, or whether these are a protected form of economic pressure. Although in many respects bargaining duties and economic weapons under the RLA are read consonant with precedents under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) (which governs all industries other than rail and air transport), there are a few decisions suggesting that during the period when self-help may be resorted to, employees can engage in partial strike activities as long as they violate no court order but are subject to permanent replacement in limited circumstances. These decisions, the authors submit, fail to take account of Supreme Court decsions since the 1930s that some economic pressures by unions, such as slowdowns and sit-ins, may not violate the labor laws but nor are they protected by those laws so as to immunize partial strikers from employer discipline. These decisions are not based on unique features of the NLRA. Rather, they give recognition to the background assumptions of Congress that employers may act to protect their property interests as long as they do not run afoul of NLRA or RLA protections and that employees who engage in partial-strike activities are subject to employer discipline even where not strictly necessary to maintain operations. Moreover, these tactics skew the bargaining process by giving employees an essentially risk-free gambit to pressure their economic position through planned disruption of carrier operations.

Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://transactionpub.metapress.com/link.asp?targe ... &id=025PGQDT3DDRU4VW (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tra:jlabre:v:23:y:2002:i:2:p:319-328

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Labor Research from Transaction Publishers
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:tra:jlabre:v:23:y:2002:i:2:p:319-328