A "Brer Rabbit" Case for Reverse Mandated Benefits
Dwight R. Lee
Journal of Labor Research, 2003, vol. 24, issue 3, 437-446
Abstract:
Reverse mandated benefits is a government-mandated policy that requires employees to provide their employers with benefits that workers would not provide otherwise. Of course, only those benefits would be mandated that are worth more to employers than they cost, as determined by political authorities. My case for such a policy argues that it is at least as sensible as policies mandating that employers provide benefits to their employees that would not be provided otherwise.
Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://transactionpub.metapress.com/link.asp?targe ... &id=E4WEAP4TQUNR4Q7C (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tra:jlabre:v:24:y:2003:i:3:p:437-446
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Labor Research from Transaction Publishers
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().