To Reward and Punish: A Classification of Union Political Strategies

Taylor E. Dark Iii

Journal of Labor Research, 2003, vol. 24, issue 3, 457-472

Abstract: The complexity of union involvement in American politics has frequently been underestimated in the existing academic literature. For this reason, it is helpful to develop a comprehensive classification of the bargaining strategies adopted by unions as they interact with elected officeholders. This classification allows a more systematic analysis of the preconditions and associated advantages and disadvantages of various union strategies in both party nominating processes and general elections. It also shows that the decision to enter electoral politics is best seen as the beginning of a complex, ongoing, and multidimensional process rather than as the end-point of a "single-play" game. Lastly, the classification demonstrates that a wider range of political choice is available to organized labor than is commonly recognized, notwithstanding the real and continuing constraints on labor power.

Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://transactionpub.metapress.com/link.asp?targe ... &id=LLLYUJ6WMKKMJ8CT (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tra:jlabre:v:24:y:2003:i:3:p:457-472

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Labor Research from Transaction Publishers
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().